Main Article Content

Authors

In this review we make a brief presentation of the text structure. Then we present a description of the contents dividing the work into three parts: (i) first we consider the introduction and then (ii) the contents developed in the first and (iii) second part of the work, including the conclusion.

Manuel Berrón, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe; Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina

Professor and doctor of philosophy. He works in Ancient Philosophy in the Philosophy degree at the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Santa Fe - Argentina). He has been part of research projects since 2005 at said university and CONICET and has received a postdoctoral grant to research in Argentina (2012-14) and Italy (2018). Author of various articles in the area of Aristotelian philosophy. He is a member of the Editorial Board of Tópicos (Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe). In addition, he is an ALFA member and currently president of the Argentine Association of Ancient Philosophy.

Matías Ezequiel Kogel, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina

Professor of Philosophy. Advanced student of the Bachelor of Philosophy. He has been part of research projects since 2016 and has made two assignments in the Chair of Ancient Philosophy at the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Santa Fe - Argentina) from 2016 to 2017. In addition, he has received scholarships for initiation of research for university students Undergraduate: Cientibeca-UNL (2017-2018) and EVC-CIN-UNL Scholarship (2019-2020). He works as a secondary level teacher.

Bolton, R. (1987). Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals. En A. Gotthelf y J. G. Lennox (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (pp. 120-166). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.

Bolton, R. (1999). The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic. En M. Sim (Ed.), From puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic (pp. 57- 105). Lanham, EUA: Lexington Books.

Burnet, J. (1900). The Ethics of Aristotle. Londres, Inglaterra: Methuen and Company.

Frede, D. (2012). The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 43, 185–216. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666164.003.0007

Karbowski, J. (2019). Aristotle’s method in ethics: philosophy in practice. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108303644

Lennox, J. (2011). Aristotle on norms of inquiry. HOPOS, 1(1), 23-46. doi: 10.1086/658482

Natali, C. (2007). Rhetorical and Scientific Aspects of the Nicomachean Ethics. Phronesis, 52(4), 364–81. doi: 10.1163/156852807X229258

Natali, C. (2010). Posterior Analytics and the Definition of Happiness in NE I. Phronesis, 55(4), 304-324. doi: 10.1163/156852810X523905

Natali, C. (2015). The search for definitions of justice in Nicomachean Ethics 5. En D. Henry y K. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle's Science and Ethics (pp. 148-168). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.

Natali, C. (2017). Il metodo e il trattato. Saggio sull’Etica Nicomachea. Roma, Italia: Edizione di Storia e Letteratura.

Owen, G. E. L. (1980). Τιθέναι τὰ φαινόμενα. En S. Mansion (Ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode (pp. 83-103). Louvain-la-neuve, Bélgica: Editions de L'Institut supérieur de philosophie.

Salmieri, G. (2009). Aristotle’s Non-‘Dialectical’ Methodology in the Nicomachean Ethics. Ancient Philosophy, 29(2), 311–35. doi: 10.5840/ancientphil200929228

Smith, R. (1993). Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic. Synthese, 96(3), 335-358. doi: 10.1007/BF01064006

Smith, R. (1999). Dialectic and Method in Aristotle. En M. Sim (Ed.), From puzzles to Principles: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic (pp. 39–55). New York, EUA: Lexington Books.

Zingano, M. (2007). Aristotle and the Problems of Method in Ethics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 32(1), 297-330.

Berrón, M., & Kogel, M. E. (2020). Karbowski, J. (2019). Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108303644. Praxis Filosófica, (51), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i51.9860

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.