Factores que contribuyen a la implementación exitosa de las innovaciones educativas potenciadas por las TIC en la escuela
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
La investigación ha mostrado que las TIC son un medio efectivo para ampliar las oportunidades educativas, pero la mayoría de los profesores no usan esta clase de tecnología como una herramienta cognitiva que ayude a mediar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de contenidos específicos. De ahí resultó pertinente llevar a cabo una revisión reflexiva al cuerpo de conocimiento de una muestra de la literatura, con el propósito de hacer explícito los factores que condicionan la implementación de innovaciones educativas potenciadas por las TIC. Se utilizó la técnica de análisis de contenido, encontrándose tres factores interrelacionados: competencia y confianza del profesor en la innovación educativa; demanda de la innovación educativa; y contexto de implementación de la innovación educativa.
Afshari, M., Abu, K., Su Luan, W., Abu Samah, B y Say Fooi, F (2009). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 77-104.
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. L. (2000). School Technology Leadership: Incidence and Impact. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey, Report# 6.
Barnea, N. & Dori, Y.J. (1999). High-school Chemistry Students’ Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 257-271.
BESA (2006). ICT in UK State Schools 2006 – summary report.
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W. & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2
Castells, M. (1996). La Era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. vol 1 la sociedad red. Madrid: Allianza Editorial.
Clements, D.H. (2000). From Exercises and Tasks to Problems and Projects – unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 9-47.
Cohen, D. K., & Barnes, C. A. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. K. Cohen & M. W. McLaughlin & J. E. Talbert (Eds.). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Connell, M.L. (1998). Technology in Constructivist Mathematics Classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, 311-338.
Consortium for School Networking. (2001). A school administrator’s guide to planning for the total cost of new technology. Washington DC: Author.
Cox, M, Abbott, C, Webb, M, Blakeley, B, Beauchamp, T & Rhodes, V. (2003a). ICT and Attainment: A Review of the Research Literature, ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series No.17. Coventry/London: Becta/DfES
Cox, M, Abbott, C, Webb, M, Blakeley, B, Beauchamp, T and Rhodes, V. (2003b). ICT and Pedagogy: A Review of the Research Literature, ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series No.18. Coventry/London: Becta/DfES
Cox, M.J. (2000). Information and Communication Technologies: their role and value for science education. In M. Monk & J.F. Osborne (Eds). Good Practice in Science Teaching – what research has to say. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Davidson, J. & Olson, M. (2003). School leadership in networked schools: Deciphering the impact of large technical systems on education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 261–281.
Dexter. S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Ronnqvist, A. M. (2002). Quality technology support: What is it? Who has it? And what difference does it make? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 265–285.
Dori, Y.J. & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 61-74.
Education Week. (1998). Technology count´98: Put school technology to test (Special Report). Washington DC: Education Week.
Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Creating Scalable and Systemic Technology Innovations for Urban Education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Seattle.
Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Cassell.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gewerc, A. & Montero, L. (2013). Culturas, formación y desarrollo profesional. La integración de las TIC en las instituciones educativas. Revista de educación, 362, doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-163
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on Technology Mediated Learning in Secondary School Mathematics Classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 73-89.
Granville, S, Russell, K and Bell, J (2005). Evaluation of the Masterclass Initiative. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Harrison, M. (1998). Coordinating information and communications technology across the primary school: A book for the primary IT coordinator. London: Falmer Press.
Hawley, W. D., & Rosenholtz, S. (1984). Good schools: A synthesis of research on how schools influence student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 4(Special Issue), 1-178.
Hearrington, D. (2006). Factors that impact the instructional and technical support provided by site-based technology coordinators in K-12 schools. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R. & Ruthven, K. (2003). Pedagogic Strategies for Using ICT to Support Subject Teaching and Learning: an analysis across 15 case studies. Research Report 03/1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). Technology support index. Eugene: Oregon.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: InternationalSociety for Technology in Education.
Karsenti, T. & Lira, M. (2011). ¿Están listos los futuros profesores para integrar las TIC en el contexto escolar? El caso de los profesores en Quebec, Canadá. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 13(1).
Khan, S., Hasan, M. and Clement, C. (2012). Barriers to the introduction of ICT into education in developing countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 61-80.
Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (1998). Internal consistency reliability for the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Information Technology (TAT) questionnaire. In S. McNeil, J. D. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Willis (Eds.). Technology and teacher education annual 1998 (Vol. 2). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Krippendorff, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. México: Paidós. Serie: Paidós Comunicación.
Lawton, J., & Gerschner, V. T. (1982). A review of the literature on attitudes towards computers and computerized instruction. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16(1), 50–55.
Linn, M.C. & Hsi, S. (2000) Computers, Teachers, Peers: science learning partners. London: Erlbaum.
Moreira, M. (2008). La innovación pedagógica con TIC y el desarrollo de las competencias informacionales y digitales. Investigación en la escuela, 64, 5-17.
Moreira, M. (2010). El proceso de integración y uso pedagógico de las TIC en los centros educativos. Un estudio de casos. Revista de Educación, 352, 77-97.
Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J., Bramald, S., Newton, L., Tymms, P., Henderson, B. &
Stout, J. (1999). Effective Pedagogy Using ICT for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
Moursund, D. (1992). The technology coordinator. Eugene, Oregon: International Society for Technology in Education.
Mp for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997). Technology and the new profesional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washinton DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
OFSTED. (2004). Report: ICT in schools - the impact of Government initiatives: Primary Schools. London: Ofsted
OFSTED. (2005). Embedding ICT in schools – a dual evaluation exercise. London: Ofsted
Pedretti, J.E., Mayer-Smith, J. & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, Text, and Talk: students’ perspectives on teaching and learning in a technology-enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82, 569-590.
Pintó, R. (2011). Las tecnologías digitales en la enseñanza de la Física y de la Química. In Didáctica de la física y la química (pp. 169-192). Secretaría General Técnica.
Ronnqvist, A., Dexter, S., & Anderson, R. (2000). Technology support: Its depth, breadth, and impact on America’s schools: Teaching, learning, and computing 1998 survey, report # 5. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information, Technology, and Organizations at University of California, Irvine.
Schulz-Zander, R., Pfeifer, M., & Voss, A. (2008). Observation measures for determining attitudes and competencies toward technology (p. 367-379). In J., Voogt & G., Knezek, (Eds). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. New York, NY 10013, USA
Simpson, M, Payne, F, Munro, R & Hughes, S (1999), Using Information and Communications Technology as a pedagogical tool: who educates the educators? Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(3), 247-262
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Facultad de enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia.
Strudler, N., & Hearrington, D. (2008). Quality support for ict in schools (p. 579-596). In J., Voogt, & G., Knezek, (Eds). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. New York, NY 10013, USA
Strudler, N., Falba, C., & Hearrington, D. (2005). The evolving roles, goals, and effectiveness of elementary technology coordinators. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia: PA.
Talanquer, V., (2009). De escuelas, docentes y TICs. Educación en química, 20(3), 345–350.
UNESCO (2016). Texto 1: Innovación Educativa. Serie Herramientas de apoyo para el trabajo docente. 1a ed. Lima: Representación de la UNESCO en Perú.
Webb, M & Cox, M. (2004). A Review of Pedagogy Related to Information and Communications Technology. Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235-286
Webb, M. (2005). ‘Affordances of ICT in Science Learning: Implications for an Integrated Pedagogy’. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705-735.
Woodrow, J. E. (1992). The influence of programming training on the computer literacy and attitudes of preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(2), 200–218.
Yildirim, S (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: a discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4) 479–496.
Zhao, J., & Xu, F. (2010). The state of ICT education in China: A literature review. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(1), 50-73.
Zhao, Y., & Kendall, C. (2001). Technology requirements for teacher: Issues of validity, reliability, and feasibility. In Y. Zhao (chair). What Teachers Should Know about Technology: perspectives and Practices. Symposium conducted at the anual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington, April 10-16.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J.L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482–515.
- Boris Fernando Candela Rodríguez, La lectura comprensiva: un instrumento para aprender ciencias , Praxis, Educación y Pedagogía: Núm. 1 (2018): Apropiación del conocimiento: Diversidad cultural y estudios ambientales en educación (Enero - Junio 2018)
- Boris Fernando Candela Rodríguez, Isabel Cristina Vanegas, Integrando la exploración del medio y el lenguaje para mediar la enculturación científica en la educación inicial , Praxis, Educación y Pedagogía: Núm. 6 (2020): Prácticas pedagógicas y formación docente (Julio - Diciembre 2020)
Artículos similares
- Andrea Suárez Salazar, Andrés Klaus Runge Peña, Educación en casa o homeschooling. Un recorrido por su terminología , Praxis, Educación y Pedagogía: Núm. 09 (2022): Número 09 (Enero - Junio 2022)
- Paola Andrea Bacca Pachón, Elba Viviana Rueda Rueda, Jose Miguel Bacca Pachón, Olga Lucía Briceño, Formación docente: una mirada entre el arte y la tecnología , Praxis, Educación y Pedagogía: Núm. 6 (2020): Prácticas pedagógicas y formación docente (Julio - Diciembre 2020)
También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.