Main Article Content

Authors

An advance report of a doctoral-level research project is presented, aiming to characterize the relationships (similarities and differences) between Technological Thinking (TT) and Scientific Thinking (ST) through the quantitative analysis and comparison of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals produced by 28 students in Cycle 4 of secondary education when solving tests on School Technological Activities (STA), School Scientific Activities (SSA), and School Techno-Scientific Activities (STSA). To this end, 12 activities were designed, validated, and implemented, four for each type of thinking. Records are analyzed at the sensor and source levels using quantitative and statistical techniques to establish relationships between the types of thinking studied. The results found show that the PC predominantly activates auditory and somatosensory areas, linked to internal dialogue, hypothesis formulation and executive planning, while the PT presents greater activation in visual and parietal areas, related to visual-motor processing and spatial working memory. On the other hand, the ATCE combine both patterns, reflecting an integrated cognitive processing that connects sensory, visual and executive information.

Julian Dario Torres Sánchez, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia.

Student of the Interinstitutional Doctorate in Education, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia.

Pedro Nel Zapata Castañeda, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia.

Professor of the Interinstitutional Doctorate in Education, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia.

Arenas, A., Ortiz, C., y Álvarez, L. (2005). Transferencia del conocimiento tecnológico al aula: Estructuración del Pensamiento Tecnológico mediante la enseñanza del diseño. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 4(2), 129–138. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553756895003

Dunbar, K. (2001). What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238374452_What_Scientific_Thinking_Reveals_About_the_Nature_of_Cognition

Dunbar, K., y Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. En K. Holyoak y R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 701–718). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035

Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright, air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. Basic Books.

Fugelsang, J., y Dunbar, K. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. En K. Holyoak y R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 705–725). Cambridge University Press.

Furman, M. (2016). Educar mentes curiosas: la formación del pensamiento científico y tecnológico en la infancia. Fundación Santillana.

Gagnepain, J. (1990). Du vouloir dire: Du signe, de l’outil [Wanting to say: The sign and the tool]. De Boeck Université.

Grandchamp, R., Rapin, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Pichat, C., Haldin, C., Cousin, E., Lachaux, J. P., Dohen, M., Perrier, P., Garnier, M., Baciu, M., y Lœvenbruck, H. (2019). The ConDialInt model: Condensation, dialogality, and intentionality dimensions of inner speech within a hierarchical predictive control framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019

Gorman, M. (1996). Psychology of science. En W. O’Donohue y R. Kitchener (Eds.), The Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 50-65). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279168

Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach [Tesis de doctorado]. West Virginia University. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8979

Hill, R. B. (1997). The Design of An Instrument to Assess Problem Solving Activities in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 46-65. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/pdf/hill.pdf

Hund, E. (1996). Nature vs. nature: the feeling of vujà dé. En R. J. Sternberg y E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, Heredity, and Environment (pp. 531 - 551). Cambridge University Press.

Le Gall, D. (1998). Des apraxies aux atechnies: Propositions pour une ergologie clinique [From apraxia to atechnia: Toward a clinical ergologia]. De Boeck Université.

McComas, W. F. (2014). Scientific thinking skills. En W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Language of Science Education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_86

Merchán, C. (2018). Orientaciones para el uso de estrategias didácticas en el desarrollo del pensamiento tecnológico (1ª ed.). Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC).

Osiurak, F., Lesourd, M., Navarro, J., y Reynaud, E. (2020). Technition: when leme come out of the closet. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(4), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620902145

Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J. P., Baciu, M., y Lœvenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural brain research, 261, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034

Rodríguez, M., y Mendivelso, F. (2018). Diseño de investigación de Corte Transversal. Revista Médica Sanitas, (21), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.20

Salkind, N. J. (1999). Métodos de investigación (3ª ed.). Prentice Hall.

Seung-Kwon, N. (2010). The Development of the Technological Thinking Disposition Measurement Instrument. Chungnam National.

Skekun. (1980). Technical Thinking And Ways of Developing it. Soviet Education, 23(2-3), 149-191. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393230203149

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press.

Strimel, G. (2014). Engineering design: a cognitive process approach [Tesis de doctorado, Old Dominion University]. STEMPS Theses & Dissertations. https://doi.org/10.25777/zzbj-b616

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2022). Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros: un nuevo contrato social para la educación. UNESCO; Fundación SM. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381560

Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001

Torres Sánchez, J. D., & Zapata Castañeda, P. N. (2024). Scientific and technological thinking: a study of their relationship through quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) in high school students. Praxis, Educación Y Pedagogía, (13), e20114524 . https://doi.org/10.25100/praxis_educacion.v0i13.14524

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.